Search results

Looks like it hit his chest from this angle.

Looking back yesterday, one thing that will kill it for the fans is where Jimenez was clearly offside, but they allowed him to continue to let VAR do it's business.

It wouldn’t be an assist, so it shouldn’t be overturned if he then lays it off. https://twitter.com/bkristianmarcus/status/1160882708622577664?s=21

Just seen the Billy Sharp goal, which is exactly that. Hits Sheffield United player on the arm, bounces off the Bournemouth players head and then Sharp scores. Goal given.

Yep, awful rule.

Final phase is assist and goal.

It did hit his arm, which is why it was ruled out. Equally, was correctly ruled out by the letter of the law. In both cases, it's the rule that's wrong not VAR. What does that mean in bold? If you are saying when it's not in the D, I've yet to see when it's not touching the line and even if it...

Has to be in the final phase.

Imagine if a bloke said he wanted an all male emergency cabinet.

I’m all for VAR, but surely this is what VAR is for not accidental handballs.

Fuck off, use google...

No rule is wank. Accidental is foul or it’s not a foul. You can’t have it been a foul in some scenarios, but not others.

[emoji23]

It’s been deleted now so we can’t see the bloke with his balls out.

Met him a few times, he’s nice guy and think that’s all that matters.

Not sure, just scroll passed it I guess. If someone is too annoying you just unfollow or block. Not really paid that much attention. I think the interaction is better than forums are. As for the likes of Danks, I quite enjoy winding him up and arguing with him.

Personal choice I guess, I prefer Twitter.

Maybe Darbs will explain next time he’s on here.

Isn’t that what you are doing here?