Search results

I think he is detrimental to what we are currently trying to do personally. Plays very deep and that isn't what you want when trying to play and press high like we had tried. Metrics wise he was the worst starting keeper heading into the weekend, and he was one of the worst last year. I said...

This at least ends the plucky Wolves not winning because they had such a tricky start narrative.

He isn't the answer though and never should have been at 10m. Absolutely terrible team planning and transfer policy. Whilst early he was already in the bottom 3 of keeper metrics heading into today. Any new manager coming in will want a better keeper and then they now have one we spent £10mil on...

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/oct/04/wolves-lose-essence-balance-top-flight-status-for-little-outlay Not familiar with the author but it's nice to actually see this sort of view of the club is being shown.

Th A massive amount of straws. That's a manager with a record of over 200 games at the time and highly thought of, coming in and changing the style and embedding new players though. Versus O'Neil who that same club actively didn't want doing that, who is now on his 2nd year and arguably...

Yeah excellent goal. Had only seen a couple of games of his before they signed him, but my mate rated him and he is a Sporting fan, so it's not easy for him to credit Porto.

Potter is on the MNF build up and they asked him about next roles and he said "I would prefer club football and am open to anything really." We certainly fit the anything category, and we are a club, so...you're telling me there's a chance!?

I think Gomes is more a future prospect though so not one I am too worried about yet. Played over a 125 less games from the looks of it. Issue is I think the talk was that if Neto leaves we were signing a like for like starter unless I have not remembered what GFFH said.

He was linked previously by Gold Flag last season. Also Sa is still here and whatever value he has I presumed is gone now. Plenty of better keepers changed clubs this season and others would have been available even at the sort of deal we seemingly wanted with Ramsdale, so there is no excuse...

I worry I am boring with this, but when Johnstone was first mentioned this was exactly what I said he was, as this is who he has always been bar the occasional game or two. Goalkeeper is the worst/weakest starting 11 position we have and it's not an area you can hide a player. It doesn't matter...

It's so easy for their CBs without Larsen though.

Was just typing this, it's pretty much a concise of summary of the issues we have with him. Just can't react to adaptions or changes.

Not sure I agree with bringing Hwang on, but at least he is playing where he should play. Personally the role Larsen does is ugly and and unrewarding but feel we are worse without it.

Excellent. He has really gotten to those two and I love it.

No issue with Semedo, it's the keeping. Many Prem keepers save that. Including some backups.

You can't be happy with that? Stiff and inflexible reaction, we will go down conceding changes like that. It's different it it's a special strike but he has made the good stop before pointless with that.

That is horrible keeping. We have paid £10mil for the slight upside Danny Ward.

He didn't know anything about it, but it's the sort of save he didn't make last week and he gets credit for it from me. Watched the ball, decent stance. Still 0-0.

Yeah my worry is this is now a key phase. Concede in these next 15 now they have grown into the game, and the promising start of as worth zero.

Disagree with that Deutsch. The commentary on the highlights (whilst not always right) says "Nothing Jose Sa could do about that." On the 2nd and I think it's a very Wolves fan POV to be blaming him for the long range shots.