• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

West Ham (A) 27/9 Build up

Status
Not open for further replies.

YoungWolf

World Cup 2014 PTG Champion - Not actually that Yo
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
31,805
Reaction score
10,152
Excited for this one now! Seeing as West Ham game went ahead last night shouldn't be any issues with ours?

Patricio
Boly Coady Saiss
Semedo Neves Moutinho Vinagre
Neto Raul Podence​

Subs: Ruddy, Kilman, Hoever, Dendoncker, Vitinha, Traore, Silva

Would be my team and bench assuming Marcal is out for a few weeks

Would start with 343 rather than the lopsided 352 Nuno seems to been keen to try/use currently.
 
Got to start Adama for me, they are there for getting at.

Patricio
Boly Coady Saiss
Semedo Neves Donk Vinagre
Traore Raul Podence​
 
Adama will probably start tbf. I'm worried it will be Neto deeper and Adama up front with Raul but you can't really drop Podence!

I like the idea of Neto running inside and Semedo overlapping though.
 
I wouldn't be disappointed to see Semedo at LWB and Hoever at RWB if Marcal is injured.
 
I wouldn't be disappointed to see Semedo at LWB and Hoever at RWB if Marcal is injured.

If they were both going to play I’d rather utilise Semedo on the outside and Hoever would be better suited to paying the more disciplined “Jonny Role” on the left.
 
Are most of us in agreement that Vinagre is not progressing to that levels we need. On the other hand will now a run of games give him that platform to get to where we want him. In previous seasons he's been in and out and completely benched for long periods...
 
I wouldn't be disappointed to see Semedo at LWB and Hoever at RWB if Marcal is injured.

I quite like that idea - massive pace on both sides if Traore is on the right. Probably mean no Podence though, which would be very difficult to do.
 
Are most of us in agreement that Vinagre is not progressing to that levels we need. On the other hand will now a run of games give him that platform to get to where we want him. In previous seasons he's been in and out and completely benched for long periods...
I think he improved in the second season from the first, but hasn't since then. Which given his age is a concern.

His defending is inconsistent, played well against Sevilla for instance, but men were running off him constantly on Monday. Despite getting into good positions his end product in the final third is next to nothing.

He would have started this season if Nuno wasn't of the same opinion.
 
He needs consistent game time which he's rarely had unfortunately. Nuno doesn't appear to trust him with that though, so I think he needs to get himself a move eventually.
 
Safe to say if Semedo is pushed over to the left until Marcel is fit will signal the end for Vinagre.
 
Patricio
Boly Coady Saiss
Semedo Neves Donk Vinagre
Traore Raul Neto​

I want to see Semedo and Adama link up. Donk gives Vinagre some support, and I think Neto has more goals in him than Pod, who is maybe more an assists man
 
Patricio

Semedo Hoever Coady Boly Vinagre

Neves Dendoncker

Traore Raul Podence

Moutinho Saiss Silva Vitinha Ruddy Kilman Neto
 
Dropping Saiss would be brutal management. Don't see that happening.
 
So you'd play Vinagre and drop Saiss to the bench? Really?

Not for me, but you're entitled to your opinion.
 
Saiss got a raw deal just because of the tackle on De Bruyne, however if youre assessing it on that mistake then Boly and Coady need to be dropped as well, the backline as a whole was abysmal on Monday.
 
Hoever isn’t here for sightseeing and it puts Boly in his best position.

Thems the breaks for Saiss. Vinagre is in as I am assuming Marçal is injured.
 
Patricio

Semedo Boly Coady Saiss Vinagre

Neves Dendoncker

Traore Raul Podence

Moutinho Hoever ,Silva Vitinha Ruddy Kilman Neto

And go for it.
 
Hoever was given the number 2 jersey - why ?

Why didn't they give it to Semendo ?

Does it mean that Hoever could be closer to starting than we think I wonder .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top