Tony Towner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 38,866
- Reaction score
- 25,397
Like Trincao he played against us for Braga
Fabio at £35m + £60k (?) a week over 5 years is a total of £50m
Kamara at £170k a week over 5 years is £44m
That'll soon stop when they realise he's Neves' replacementLoads of Wolves fans on other sites are creaming their pants about this guy, from what I've seen I'm a bit underwhelmed, admittedly I've only seen him in one and a half games.
The online sites which report salaries aren't overly reliable and probably all copy each other, but £80kpw is the consistent number. The price you pay for a generational talentWould imagine Fabio is currently on significantly less than that salary too.
Depends on the price for me, although I've not been overly impressed, I'm guessing he's not terrible and would be fine to take over the defensive part of Ruben's role, he's also got a 'physical presence' maybe good in the air? But they're talking 20m plus, I suspect that will be not far off half what we get for Neves, doesn't leave much to splash on another midfielder, CB and forward.Maybe Palhinha isn’t very good but we could easily have 0 senior midfielders soon so I don’t think we can be picky!
If it's Barca then difficult to tell as it looks like their cast offs will be thrown in as make weights. If not then I think we'll get about £50m. Given my lack of faith in our negotiating I'd be more surprised at £60m than I would £40mWhat fee should we be expecting for Neves? (ignoring that Jeff and Scott will likely get their pants pulled down again.)
Yeah, i'd like to think 60m but as you say if it's Barca the figure will be shrouded in mystery with players/exchanges/loans, also lets hope we don't stagger the payments in the same way we have for Jota, it's scandalous that we are borrowing against what we are owed and paying a premium to do so.If it's Barca then difficult to tell as it looks like their cast offs will be thrown in as make weights. If not then I think we'll get about £50m. Given my lack of faith in our negotiating I'd be more surprised at £60m than I would £40m
They're just not comparable are they? Attacking players always command a bigger fee. For example, Jota, who couldn't get in our team towards the end went for 40mill, yet some of us are expecting about 40mill for Neves who is far more important to us than Jota ever was.My immediate thought is if Grealish is worth £100m, why not Neves?
Although... is my perspective being coloured by my loyalty here? Is Neves actually as good as Grealish?
If it was United though, there might be a few makeweights we could benefit from. £60m + van de Beek and Dalot would certainly make me think twice.Yeah, i'd like to think 60m but as you say if it's Barca the figure will be shrouded in mystery with players/exchanges/loans, also lets hope we don't stagger the payments in the same way we have for Jota, it's scandalous that we are borrowing against what we are owed and paying a premium to do so.
If it's to a club in England then we really should be getting a bigger fee, English clubs have more money afterall.
If he is to go anywhere, i hope it's Barca, as said by many i couldn't stomach him going to United.