Search results

This is not what the court has ruled though. The ruling of the court applies only to the definition of sex under the Equality Act 2010.

Easy

Fixed it for you

You are giving him too much credit. The most powerful man in the world just got his ass handed to him on a plate and he had to u-turn. There was no negotiation. His public comments on this are the signs of a desperate man desperately trying to say this was his plan when it is quite clear he has...

He means tax increases but won’t say it. No matter what he does, it is paid for by tax increases.

You agree that he doesn’t have a clue what he’s talking about? The state has been directly intervening in the market to a greater or lesser extent ever since the market was invented. The extent of direct intervention has often been debated but never the idea (other than by nutjob free market...

How do you know what is a problem for me? All I asked for were for some examples which you still haven’t provided. I’m beginning to think you are a lot of words but very little substance.

Where have I mentioned "balancing out"? I wanted you to provide examples of this long list you have so we could discuss them. You haven't provided any examples. You could, for example, have mentioned the Qatargate issue which is ongoing and I am sure you have many more examples to share.

To be accurate, he actually said Socialists...not the left.

https://breakingthelines.com/player-analysis/marshall-nyasha-munetsi-reims-zimbabwean-midfielder/ Pretty accurate assessment I think...

Yeah. But examples? You have such a long list, one or two would illustrate your point.

I didn’t ask for them all, I asked for examples.

Don't leave us hanging...please provide examples.

Boris Johnson

Cunha says he was misinterpreted and that he wants to take Wolves to the next level, to win titles with Wolves. Nah. Probably not.

Capitalist economies, in their purest form, are also socially repressive.

Some years ago I was doing a degree at Birkbeck that had been put together by a group of lecturers of the left (they looked down on everybody which is how I knew they were left). One of the theories of economics was that of techno-economic paradigms...

Fair enough, is your second sentence also reductive?

What is definitely patronising is saying that “the left” is one homogenous group that all think, act and speak in the same way.

I am sure if you compare 1970s living standards to the 1920s the same could be said. It’s not really relevant