Search results

It's cute you won't engage on any of the points it makes because it doesn't suit your agenda. You try and mock because I am correct. Cute.

See below

I would argue you can't separate the technology of VAR from referees. The technology of VAR is essentially just pictures. These pictures will just be interpreted by a different referee. There is one tech fail point for VAR and that is frame rates, we can not be exactly sure the release point of...

https://www.arsenal.com/news/club-statement-1 VAR all going to plan!

Not doubting that my friend, just usually those arguments never come from fans with STs.

You're right there. It is frustrating when I hear the same pro-VAR arguments all the time. It's been going years now and fans still come out with classics like "It works in Europe" "It's not VAR, its the refs!" (VAR is and always will be run by refs) I'm sympathetic to people who think VAR can...

He insulted me, I insulted him. Happy to leave but his behaviour is no different to mine. I just sunk to his level.

A bit like all of your arguments on this thread then. Maybe it will fail miserably, exactly like VAR ever since its inception (y)

His username has 75 in it which suggests he could be 48 years old and using the term "take the L". Blimey.

I'd worry they'd run out of ink for the cons list ;)

"take the L" I hope for your sake you've older than 12. You must be getting used to "Taking L's" this season mate.

You have done this continually my friend. How can you be oblivious to that?

100%. Refs don't want to make big decisions thinking VAR will clear it up, but VAR wants to back the ref.

There's no point trying on a forum really. Most fans who wanted VAR are too bloody-minded to admit they might have been wrong and the game was more fun without it. Like everything in life, positions become entrenched. If we have to keep VAR, the bare minimum should be a "Margin or error"...

Blimey, you're not the brightest spark are you? Or at least you have never worked in academia. Peer-reviewed studies are often debated and even disproven within the world of academia. I'm not worried about embarrassing myself at all, you have happily embarrassed yourself throughout this entire...

There is a certain pot-kettleness about you calling anyone out on bullshit, as I'm pretty sure it was you who said VAR was "a Premier League problem". There is no way your second sentence isn't bullshit, because a "correct decision" is subjective. The laws have always been there for the...

Referees have the final say in every league below the Premier League in England and fans are grown up enough to deal with that. Also, referees still have the final say, just different ones sat in a box miles away.

Remember VAR is a "Premier League problem" 🥱

Spot on

VAR will show people pictures, it will always be subject to human interpretation. The reason VAR can never "work" in terms of being 100% accurate is it is still (and always will be) run by humans. Humans = human error. Just a different human not at the stadium. It might be more accurate...