Who was the Strasbourg lad we were keen on, before Bellegarde, but Chelsea wouldn't let him leave? This multi-ownership model must surely fall foul of some EU anti-competition law. One of the worst aspects of the modern game.
Edit: added an e
I've no issue with how the US chooses to naturalise spouses of citizens, but it does kind of piss on the concept of national competition to be able to represent the US after playing for NZ in legit Test and ODI matches.
Is it because the US is only an Associate nation? I'm guessing he couldn't...
My Maple Leafs jersey cost about the same as the new Spurs shirt, has no sponsor logos and will be worn by the team for about a decade, unchanged.
Same for the Blue Jays. Bought a jersey in 2017 and they’re still using the exact same one
Not that the club deserves the benefit of the doubt, but just to show that pre-production mock-ups and the final versions can and will look significantly different.
Rancid betting sponsors pretty irredeemable either way.
Any Sudu shirt was always going to look like where it comes from; LiNing-style shite for badminton fans in Changsha and Zhengzhou.
But Christ that is poor. And virtually translucent, too.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.